[pm-h] complex data structure help
Matt Sisk
sisk at mojotoad.com
Tue Mar 28 11:30:16 PST 2006
Paul Archer wrote:
> 11:31am, Paul Archer wrote:
>
>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Only that seems inefficient. Could I normalize that somehow?
>>
> I talked this over with a coworker. He suggested one table each for users,
> client machines, and filesystems, just for lookups. Then one table for a
> combination of the three, and one table for timeperiods with the bytes
> written or read for each time period.
>
That's not just normalized...it's first normal form. ;)
(more or less)
Matt
More information about the Houston
mailing list