From linux at codehelp.co.uk Tue Aug 10 14:52:08 2004 From: linux at codehelp.co.uk (Neil Williams) Date: Tue Aug 10 15:08:08 2004 Subject: [DCPM] Delays? Message-ID: <200408102052.08977.linux@codehelp.co.uk> :-) I sent a message a month ago and it's just turned up, Simon sent one two weeks ago and that's just turned up. was devoncornwall@pm.org switched off and now been activated again, perchance? BTW. Does anyone use Ensim on a reseller package? It's supposed to be REAL easy but I can't get the damned thing to let me login on FTP/SSH/PHP_nuke, it won't enable subdomains that it says exist! -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.codehelp.co.uk/ http://www.dclug.org.uk/ http://www.isbn.org.uk/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/isbnsearch/ http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x8801094A28BCB3E3 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: signature Url : http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/devoncornwall-pm/attachments/20040810/3957ee52/attachment.bin From steve at devon-it.co.uk Tue Aug 10 16:22:05 2004 From: steve at devon-it.co.uk (Steve Marvell) Date: Tue Aug 10 16:18:52 2004 Subject: [DCPM] Delays? In-Reply-To: <200408102052.08977.linux@codehelp.co.uk> References: <200408102052.08977.linux@codehelp.co.uk> Message-ID: <20040810212205.GA5607@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Neil Williams wrote: > I sent a message a month ago and it's just turned up, Simon sent one > two weeks ago and that's just turned up. was devoncornwall@pm.org > switched off and now been activated again, perchance? No, it's that you and Simon got held for some reason liek "explicit destination" or something. This last mail did too. Steve From linux at codehelp.co.uk Tue Aug 10 16:38:33 2004 From: linux at codehelp.co.uk (Neil Williams) Date: Tue Aug 10 16:38:35 2004 Subject: [DCPM] Delays? In-Reply-To: <20040810212205.GA5607@flumpet.demon.co.uk> References: <200408102052.08977.linux@codehelp.co.uk> <20040810212205.GA5607@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <200408102238.39355.linux@codehelp.co.uk> On Tuesday 10 August 2004 10:22, Steve Marvell wrote: > Neil Williams wrote: > No, it's that you and Simon got held for some reason liek "explicit > destination" or something. This last mail did too. Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Message has implicit destination I got the report, but it didn't make any sense - of course it has an implicit destination, it was destined for the list! ?? -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.codehelp.co.uk/ http://www.dclug.org.uk/ http://www.isbn.org.uk/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/isbnsearch/ http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x8801094A28BCB3E3 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: signature Url : http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/devoncornwall-pm/attachments/20040810/3d46ee38/attachment.bin From steve at devon-it.co.uk Tue Aug 10 16:48:57 2004 From: steve at devon-it.co.uk (Steve Marvell) Date: Tue Aug 10 16:46:32 2004 Subject: [DCPM] Delays? In-Reply-To: <200408102238.39355.linux@codehelp.co.uk> References: <200408102052.08977.linux@codehelp.co.uk> <20040810212205.GA5607@flumpet.demon.co.uk> <200408102238.39355.linux@codehelp.co.uk> Message-ID: <20040810214857.GA5736@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Neil Williams wrote: > I got the report, but it didn't make any sense - of course it has an > implicit destination, it was destined for the list! This mail didn't get trapped. Steve From simon at wretched.demon.co.uk Wed Aug 11 12:41:26 2004 From: simon at wretched.demon.co.uk (Simon Waters) Date: Wed Aug 11 12:45:51 2004 Subject: [DCPM] Delays? In-Reply-To: <20040810214857.GA5736@flumpet.demon.co.uk> References: <200408102052.08977.linux@codehelp.co.uk> <20040810212205.GA5607@flumpet.demon.co.uk> <200408102238.39355.linux@codehelp.co.uk> <20040810214857.GA5736@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <1092246086.30889.TMDA@email.demon.co.uk> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve Marvell wrote: | Neil Williams wrote: | | |>I got the report, but it didn't make any sense - of course it has an |>implicit destination, it was destined for the list! | | | This mail didn't get trapped. But Neil asked if "devoncornwall@pm.org" presumably Mailman doesn't know this list also has this name? The GNU lists I look after (well that might be overstating it - I could look if I had the time might be more accurate) are always complaining about implicit destination because people gateway NNTP in and out of it - - or try to - as well as being open lists so they get spammed. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBGlpFGFXfHI9FVgYRAkWuAJ4pgWb1WFzde49qdmHrkzgqiIDB4wCfRmDl Qaz/Gf4H0ojWzZMwcRUhSxk= =FYpT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----