[Delhi-pm] Suggestions
Pradeep Pant
pp at ockham.be
Wed Feb 29 22:57:58 PST 2012
I do not see any harm in using the modern tools to publicize the group. For members I think mailing list is sufficient to know all the development so there is no compulsion to join all these sub-groups etc .... in fact if you see in both twitter and Google+ page we are telling visitors to join mailing list.
Cheers,
Pradeep
-----Original Message-----
From: delhi-pm-bounces+pp=ockham.be at pm.org on behalf of Raj Mathur (??? ?????)
Sent: Wed 2/29/2012 4:49 PM
To: delhi-pm at pm.org
Subject: Re: [Delhi-pm] Suggestions
On Wednesday 29 Feb 2012, Mayank Srivastava wrote:
> I would like to suggest to make a twitter handle for us, something
> like @Delhi.pm or something we all can agree upon, like the San
> Francisco Perl mongers <https://twitter.com/#!/sfperlmongers> use,
>
> and we should also use a dedicated hash tag for related tweets.
>
> This will allow us to reach maximum number of people.
Speaking purely for myself, I'm OK with promoting and discussing on any
online service that doesn't require me to create a login. If Google
Groups can be accessed with my existing e-mail ID and without having to
create a login there, fine. Ditto Twitter, Google+, Facebook, Google
Docs, etc.
If a service requires you to create an account to access the
discussions/documents/feeds/whatever, include me out.
Regards,
-- Raj
--
Raj Mathur || raju at kandalaya.org || GPG:
http://otheronepercent.blogspot.com || http://kandalaya.org || CC68
It is the mind that moves || http://schizoid.in || D17F
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/delhi-pm/attachments/20120301/0db0bd48/attachment.html>
More information about the Delhi-pm
mailing list