我没那个意思,我举这个例子是想说明书,CPUG的讨论的确要比perlchina热闹多了。<br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/22/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">joe jiang</b> <<a href="mailto:lamp.purl@gmail.com">lamp.purl@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">有人喜欢代码塞满邮箱么?还是喜欢每天有练习的收获呢?<br>既然是内心喜欢的东西,就不要看重外在的体面。<br><br>On 四, 2008-05-22 at 11:24 +0800, katkat lim wrote:<br>
> 举个例子说吧。。。<br>> 有订阅perlchina和CPUG的人就知道了,CPUG的邮件可以塞满邮箱,perchina的<br>> 邮件几天不见一封。<br>><br>><br>> On 5/22/08, purl lamp <<a href="mailto:lamp.purl@gmail.com">lamp.purl@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> perl is not optimized for 闲逛 :D<br>
><br>> 2008/5/22 Barret <<a href="mailto:barretz@gmail.com">barretz@gmail.com</a>>:<br>> 最近逛了一圈 python 的网站,然后逛到 perlchina ,发觉<br>> 热闹程度不成比例。<br>><br>><br>> 不过总觉得 perl6 是不是等太久了,不会变成气泡软件吧?<br>
> 大家觉得现在 perl 之于 python 有哪些问题需要改进呢?<br>> python<br>> 都上云计算环境了,perl 会不会有点积重难返?<br>><br>> --<br>> Gmail - I love this G.<br>> _______________________________________________<br>
> China-pm mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:China-pm@pm.org">China-pm@pm.org</a><br>> <a href="http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/china-pm">http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/china-pm</a><br>
><br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> China-pm mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:China-pm@pm.org">China-pm@pm.org</a><br>> <a href="http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/china-pm">http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/china-pm</a><br>
><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> China-pm mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:China-pm@pm.org">China-pm@pm.org</a><br>> <a href="http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/china-pm">http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/china-pm</a><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>China-pm mailing list<br><a href="mailto:China-pm@pm.org">China-pm@pm.org</a><br><a href="http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/china-pm">http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/china-pm</a></blockquote>
</div><br>