<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div><br><br>On Aug 27, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Andy Lester <<a href="mailto:andy@petdance.com">andy@petdance.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<br><div><div>On Aug 27, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Doug Bell wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse:separate;font-family:Georgia;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:-webkit-auto;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;font-size:medium"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:monospace">How do I get make test to recurse into subdirectories?<br>
</span></span></blockquote></div><div><br></div>Did you try it with just specifying a top level directory name ("t/") instead of the files ("t/*.t")?<div><br></div><div>prove was written to operate on directories if files weren't specified, like how ack works on directories and you don't have to specify files. That behavior is still there in prove today, but I don't know about doing it through EUMM and however it talks to the harness.</div>
</div></blockquote><br><div>I gave it a try, but it doesn't work as the TESTS argument to EUMM, because EUMM uses Test::Harness::runtests() directly.</div><div><br></div><div>So I've started porting this first module to M::B to see what happens</div>
</body></html>