[Chicago-talk] Chicago-talk Digest, Vol 81, Issue 11
Brad Doty
bdoty at eqtc.com
Mon Apr 12 07:21:36 PDT 2010
hehe, I think Steven was taking a jab at the irrational style of braces
sub foo {
code here
} # rational ending brace
} # worse yet, ala emacs
which was published in 1990s C++ text books and is enforced by emacs.
Unfortunately that caught on with younger programmers and now you need
the colored-syntax editors just to see at a glance where your stinking
blocks start and end. I'll refrain from using the word "stupid" again
after last week's rant. Perhaps that is a plot by emacs to force you to
use something besides vanilla vi.
bRad
-----Original Message-----
From: chicago-talk-request at pm.org
Reply-to: chicago-talk at pm.org
To: chicago-talk at pm.org
Subject: Chicago-talk Digest, Vol 81, Issue 11
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:00:12 -0700
Send Chicago-talk mailing list submissions to
chicago-talk at pm.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
chicago-talk-request at pm.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
chicago-talk-owner at pm.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Chicago-talk digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: A Perl::Critic question (Steven Lembark)
2. Re: A Perl::Critic question (Elliot Shank)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 23:10:21 -0400
From: Steven Lembark <lembark at wrkhors.com>
Subject: Re: [Chicago-talk] A Perl::Critic question
To: chicago-talk at pm.org
Message-ID: <20100410231021.3f6f92f1lembark at wrkhors.com@wrkhors.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 16:33:22 -0500 (CDT)
Mike Fragassi <frag at ripco.com> wrote:
>
> This is not a big deal, but is confusing me.
>
> According to the docs, both of these should turn off Perl::Critic within
> foo():
>
> 1) sub foo { ## no critic
> 2) sub foo {
> ## no critic
>
> But I'm finding that only the former works. Is there something about
> the #2 form that I'm missing? (This is with the most recent
> Perl::Critic and perl 5.8.5.)
Maybe it just wants you to use intelligent braces:
sub foo
{ ## no critic
}
More information about the Chicago-talk
mailing list