[Chicago-talk] Is it worth to be put in CPAN?

tiger peng tigerpeng2001 at yahoo.com
Fri Feb 16 12:24:09 PST 2007


Finally, I got time to put my Data::Hierarchy::Traverser module on CPAN.

If you have time, please take a look and I am more than willing to hear any feedback from you.

http://search.cpan.org/~tigerperl/Data-Hierarchy-Traverser-0.01/lib/Data/Hierarchy/Traverser.pm




----- Original Message ----
From: Steven Lembark <lembark at wrkhors.com>
To: Chicago.pm chatter <chicago-talk at pm.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:46:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Chicago-talk] Is it worth to be put in CPAN?


> The module proposed is just for traversing across
> hierarchy (tree, trees) structure inspired by Dominus's
> HOP. The function is not specified for growing trees,
> trimming trees, nor burning trees. Its behavior depends
> on the optional callback functions passed into it. By
> default, it only walks through the hierarchy structure
> without doing anything, except using some system
> resources. That\xE2\x80'x99s what I mean
> generic.

So long as the module doesn't seriously break the
perl distro there isn't any harm in putting it out
there. Given the function of it is simple, work on
creating a simple, well-documented interface. You
could end up with a module that people use because
they can use it :-)


-- 
Steven Lembark                                         85-09 90th Street
Workhorse Computing                                  Woodhaven, NY 11421
lembark at wrkhors.com                                      +1 888 359 3508
_______________________________________________
Chicago-talk mailing list
Chicago-talk at pm.org
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/chicago-talk





More information about the Chicago-talk mailing list