[Chicago-talk] What module will we attack?
andy at petdance.com
Wed Aug 11 13:36:37 CDT 2004
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 12:38:24PM -0500, Mike Fragassi (frag at ripco.com) wrote:
> Another one that would be feasible is HTML::Tree. (Author: SBURKE, %42
> coverage). Or Scalar::List::Utils. (GBARR, %36 coverage.) Or we can go
> for broke: CGI.pm! (70% coverage.)
HTML::Tree or Scalar::List::Utils would seem to me to be even better
choices. I'm sure Graham would be on board, and I can't imagine Sean
wouldn't as well.
Shawn: Do you mind if we poke at one of these instead?
Andy Lester => andy at petdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
More information about the Chicago-talk