From themanchicken at gmail.com  Thu Aug 23 13:17:21 2012
From: themanchicken at gmail.com (Michael Stemle)
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:17:21 -0500
Subject: [CMI.PM] I Propose a PM Meeting
Message-ID: <CAMFxJtxO8ayEdhNDGqeiucsTb1Rih4p2fhNj-R9aLTCyx_L9JQ@mail.gmail.com>

I propose we meet on the 8th of September at Atlanta Bread Company (Neil
Street) at noon.

-- 
~ Michael D. Stemle, Jr.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/champaign-urbana/attachments/20120823/18189bba/attachment.html>

From BPrice at atgf.com  Fri Aug 24 08:00:50 2012
From: BPrice at atgf.com (Price, Bob)
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:00:50 -0500
Subject: [CMI.PM] Mongers - need to pick your brains
Message-ID: <6DDBFE51A6376D468886B660FC6261A7057A1C85@chi-msg-04.atgf.com>

I?m looking for a way to find out on a windoze platform whether or not a file is open by another process or user.

Scenario: 

I have a process that copies files from one location to another, and deletes the original file upon successful copy. The problem arises when a user is holding that file open in another program (i.e. open in acrobat, still being written, etc.), and I don?t want to loop back and copy the file again. I would rather be able to determine that the file is in use, and just skip on to the next file, coming back later to check on the file and process it when it is no longer in use.

Any experience with this?


From bobjkuo at gmail.com  Fri Aug 24 08:21:28 2012
From: bobjkuo at gmail.com (Bob Kuo)
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:21:28 -0500
Subject: [CMI.PM] Mongers - need to pick your brains
In-Reply-To: <6DDBFE51A6376D468886B660FC6261A7057A1C85@chi-msg-04.atgf.com>
References: <6DDBFE51A6376D468886B660FC6261A7057A1C85@chi-msg-04.atgf.com>
Message-ID: <CAGuPgHLhO+3BKF8OiXCQeysbLopXzOcmxP7cYVF3bsBGUnWLww@mail.gmail.com>

Looks like this stack overflow post might be perfect:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3220206/determine-whether-a-file-is-in-use-in-perl-on-windows

There might be a nicer way if your machine has powershell which would
allow you to directly call Windows APIs.

b

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Price, Bob <BPrice at atgf.com> wrote:
> I?m looking for a way to find out on a windoze platform whether or not a file is open by another process or user.
>
> Scenario:
>
> I have a process that copies files from one location to another, and deletes the original file upon successful copy. The problem arises when a user is holding that file open in another program (i.e. open in acrobat, still being written, etc.), and I don?t want to loop back and copy the file again. I would rather be able to determine that the file is in use, and just skip on to the next file, coming back later to check on the file and process it when it is no longer in use.
>
> Any experience with this?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Champaign-Urbana mailing list
> Champaign-Urbana at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/champaign-urbana

From steven.stone at gmail.com  Fri Aug 24 20:12:20 2012
From: steven.stone at gmail.com (Steven Stone)
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 23:12:20 -0400
Subject: [CMI.PM] Mongers - need to pick your brains
In-Reply-To: <CAGuPgHLhO+3BKF8OiXCQeysbLopXzOcmxP7cYVF3bsBGUnWLww@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6DDBFE51A6376D468886B660FC6261A7057A1C85@chi-msg-04.atgf.com>
	<CAGuPgHLhO+3BKF8OiXCQeysbLopXzOcmxP7cYVF3bsBGUnWLww@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOtx5vgXp615EB8c21JCdTnT1xwXZNjEW0b+3vbM8_A70-Bu8w@mail.gmail.com>

I think this is what you want:  (note, I haven't tried it)

   http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896655


On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Bob Kuo <bobjkuo at gmail.com> wrote:

> Looks like this stack overflow post might be perfect:
>
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3220206/determine-whether-a-file-is-in-use-in-perl-on-windows
>
> There might be a nicer way if your machine has powershell which would
> allow you to directly call Windows APIs.
>
> b
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Price, Bob <BPrice at atgf.com> wrote:
> > I?m looking for a way to find out on a windoze platform whether or not a
> file is open by another process or user.
> >
> > Scenario:
> >
> > I have a process that copies files from one location to another, and
> deletes the original file upon successful copy. The problem arises when a
> user is holding that file open in another program (i.e. open in acrobat,
> still being written, etc.), and I don?t want to loop back and copy the file
> again. I would rather be able to determine that the file is in use, and
> just skip on to the next file, coming back later to check on the file and
> process it when it is no longer in use.
> >
> > Any experience with this?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Champaign-Urbana mailing list
> > Champaign-Urbana at pm.org
> > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/champaign-urbana
> _______________________________________________
> Champaign-Urbana mailing list
> Champaign-Urbana at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/champaign-urbana
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/champaign-urbana/attachments/20120824/94144abe/attachment.html>

From cjfields at illinois.edu  Mon Aug 27 07:03:03 2012
From: cjfields at illinois.edu (Fields, Christopher J)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:03:03 +0000
Subject: [CMI.PM] Active?
Message-ID: <118F034CF4C3EF48A96F86CE585B94BF33B8834C@CHIMBX5.ad.uillinois.edu>

Is CMI-PM still active?  It's not showing up on the main perl monger's page (now updated):

http://www.pm.org/

chris

From steven.stone at gmail.com  Mon Aug 27 14:23:53 2012
From: steven.stone at gmail.com (Steven Stone)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:23:53 -0400
Subject: [CMI.PM] Active?
In-Reply-To: <118F034CF4C3EF48A96F86CE585B94BF33B8834C@CHIMBX5.ad.uillinois.edu>
References: <118F034CF4C3EF48A96F86CE585B94BF33B8834C@CHIMBX5.ad.uillinois.edu>
Message-ID: <CAOtx5vhZ-tm2ixSTiL6Sxsa4m_ePAbXZ0VPehPa7wyuUV1iqQg@mail.gmail.com>

Moderately active.  There are about 4-5 core members who've been meeting
more and less regularly for several years, plus a few who come and go.

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Fields, Christopher J <
cjfields at illinois.edu> wrote:

> Is CMI-PM still active?  It's not showing up on the main perl monger's
> page (now updated):
>
> http://www.pm.org/
>
> chris
> _______________________________________________
> Champaign-Urbana mailing list
> Champaign-Urbana at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/champaign-urbana
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/champaign-urbana/attachments/20120827/cbd9d053/attachment.html>

From themanchicken at gmail.com  Mon Aug 27 14:47:07 2012
From: themanchicken at gmail.com (Michael Stemle)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:47:07 -0500
Subject: [CMI.PM] Active?
In-Reply-To: <CAOtx5vhZ-tm2ixSTiL6Sxsa4m_ePAbXZ0VPehPa7wyuUV1iqQg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <118F034CF4C3EF48A96F86CE585B94BF33B8834C@CHIMBX5.ad.uillinois.edu>
	<CAOtx5vhZ-tm2ixSTiL6Sxsa4m_ePAbXZ0VPehPa7wyuUV1iqQg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMFxJtwECN+kJcPWyPfV83EueZgSh=59-j3SA89znzH1ScOgeA@mail.gmail.com>

We've been talking about meeting sometime this weekend, or the one
afterwards.
On Aug 27, 2012 4:24 PM, "Steven Stone" <steven.stone at gmail.com> wrote:

> Moderately active.  There are about 4-5 core members who've been meeting
> more and less regularly for several years, plus a few who come and go.
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Fields, Christopher J <
> cjfields at illinois.edu> wrote:
>
>> Is CMI-PM still active?  It's not showing up on the main perl monger's
>> page (now updated):
>>
>> http://www.pm.org/
>>
>> chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> Champaign-Urbana mailing list
>> Champaign-Urbana at pm.org
>> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/champaign-urbana
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Champaign-Urbana mailing list
> Champaign-Urbana at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/champaign-urbana
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/champaign-urbana/attachments/20120827/e694efe8/attachment.html>

From BPrice at atgf.com  Mon Aug 27 14:51:01 2012
From: BPrice at atgf.com (Price, Bob)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:51:01 -0500
Subject: [CMI.PM] Active?
In-Reply-To: <CAMFxJtwECN+kJcPWyPfV83EueZgSh=59-j3SA89znzH1ScOgeA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <118F034CF4C3EF48A96F86CE585B94BF33B8834C@CHIMBX5.ad.uillinois.edu><CAOtx5vhZ-tm2ixSTiL6Sxsa4m_ePAbXZ0VPehPa7wyuUV1iqQg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMFxJtwECN+kJcPWyPfV83EueZgSh=59-j3SA89znzH1ScOgeA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6DDBFE51A6376D468886B660FC6261A70580FC45@chi-msg-04.atgf.com>

FYI: I?ve been trying to contact Dan to see if we can take over the list and website.

 

From: Champaign-Urbana [mailto:champaign-urbana-bounces+bprice=atgf.com at pm.org] On Behalf Of Michael Stemle
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 4:47 PM
To: Steven Stone
Cc: Champaign-Urbana Mongers
Subject: Re: [CMI.PM] Active?

 

We've been talking about meeting sometime this weekend, or the one afterwards. 

On Aug 27, 2012 4:24 PM, "Steven Stone" <steven.stone at gmail.com> wrote:

Moderately active.  There are about 4-5 core members who've been meeting more and less regularly for several years, plus a few who come and go.

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Fields, Christopher J <cjfields at illinois.edu> wrote:

Is CMI-PM still active?  It's not showing up on the main perl monger's page (now updated):

http://www.pm.org/

chris
_______________________________________________
Champaign-Urbana mailing list
Champaign-Urbana at pm.org
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/champaign-urbana



_______________________________________________
Champaign-Urbana mailing list
Champaign-Urbana at pm.org
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/champaign-urbana

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/champaign-urbana/attachments/20120827/e90ed64b/attachment.html>