[Buffalo-pm] Application Development Framework...
Michael Graham
magog at the-wire.com
Mon Aug 13 04:05:18 PDT 2007
CGI::Application is a great platform. I've been using it for a couple
of years at work. It's very flexible, and that's both a strength and a
weakness. When you're starting out, you do have to sort through all its
plugins and pick which ones you want.
The idea behind CGI::Application::Framework was to bundle up a lot of
the C::A plugins and best practices into one place with good
documentation. Sadly, we never finished. So if you're going to use
C::A, I'd recommend using the plugins directly:
C::A::Plugin::Session
C::A::Plugin::Authentication
C::A::Plugin::LogDispatch
C::A::Plugin::Config::Context (or equiv)
C::A::Plugin::AnyTemplate (or C::A::Plugin::TT)
C::A::Plugin::ValidateRM
C::A::Plugin::FillInForm
C::A::Plugin::FormState
C::A::Plugin::Forward
C::A::Plugin::DevPopup
C::A::Plugin::MessageStack
C::A::Dispatch
It's a long list, but for the most part they do what they say they do
and have good docs.
Michael
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
Daniel Magnuszewski <dmagnuszewski at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Mongers,
>
> I'm about to begin writing a web application that will have a MySQL
> backend, and will be a relatively low volume user base (at first
> anyways). I want a nice and clean MVC framework to use and have come
> across a few. There are the high profile frameworks like Catalyst,
> but I'm also wondering about CGI::Application::Framework and
> CGI::Prototype.
>
> I ran across the following page that gives an overview of some other
> frameworks:
>
> http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/index.cgi?OtherFrameworks
>
> My question, is which is the cleanest, most stable, and easiest to
> use? Which frameworks have you used, what did you find, and which one
> would you recommend?
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Dan
--
Michael Graham <magog at the-wire.com>
More information about the Buffalo-pm
mailing list