From walter at frii.com Fri Oct 26 12:32:16 2001 From: walter at frii.com (Walter Pienciak) Date: Wed Aug 4 23:58:37 2004 Subject: [boulder.pm] web-based mail reader Message-ID: I'm considering setting up a web-based mail interface for my family domain. I could reinvent the wheel. Or, I could install one of the (apparently) zillion solutions out there in the open-source world. Anyone have an opinion? Features I need: - POP and/or IMAP are nice, but it has to be able to read the >>>>>local Unix mail files<<<<< - crypto support would be nice, but not required. (I'm not sure my mom has a PGP/GPG key.) - FREE. This is a family toy, not a business. - Perl. (Well, not really required, but adding this is the best way to make the post arguably on-topic. ;^) I'd run this through SSL. On Unix. With Apache. mod_perl. mod_php. Walter From rise at knavery.net Fri Oct 26 13:41:18 2001 From: rise at knavery.net (rise) Date: Wed Aug 4 23:58:37 2004 Subject: [boulder.pm] web-based mail reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Walter Pienciak wrote: > - POP and/or IMAP are nice, but it has to be able to read the > >>>>>local Unix mail files<<<<< So the standard "talk to a local-only IMAP daemon" isn't workable? Any particular reason why (other than that it adds another layer of complexity)? > - Perl. (Well, not really required, but adding this is the best > way to make the post arguably on-topic. ;^) I'd have thought the almost inevitable mail-box locking schemes Holy War would have done that. If you can't find fruitful ground for obscure and crufty Perl snippets in that we might as well all go home. > I'd run this through SSL. On Unix. With Apache. mod_perl. mod_php. Okay. I've just got to ask - why both mod_perl & mod_php? -- Jonathan Conway "Reverse Polish LISP" - for those times Forth rise@knavery.net just isn't on enough crack. From skitt at colorado.edu Fri Oct 26 13:54:24 2001 From: skitt at colorado.edu (Bill Skitt) Date: Wed Aug 4 23:58:37 2004 Subject: [boulder.pm] web-based mail reader References: Message-ID: <001301c15e4f$a1595c60$b2228a80@resnet.Colorado.EDU> > I'm considering setting up a web-based mail interface for > my family domain. > > I could reinvent the wheel. > Or, I could install one of the (apparently) zillion solutions out > there in the open-source world. Anyone have an opinion? A company I did some work for recently switched from "NeoMail" -- a rather frustrating script to configure, but functional and in perl -- to "Null WebMail", which can be found at http://nullwebmail.sourceforge.net/ It's written in C but works very well. > Features I need: > > - POP and/or IMAP are nice, but it has to be able to read the > >>>>>local Unix mail files<<<<< > > - crypto support would be nice, but not required. (I'm not sure > my mom has a PGP/GPG key.) > > - FREE. This is a family toy, not a business. > > - Perl. (Well, not really required, but adding this is the best > way to make the post arguably on-topic. ;^) > > I'd run this through SSL. On Unix. With Apache. mod_perl. mod_php. > > Walter > From myke at komar.org Fri Oct 26 13:40:04 2001 From: myke at komar.org (Myke Komarnitsky) Date: Wed Aug 4 23:58:37 2004 Subject: [boulder.pm] date --> unix timestamp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20011026123742.024e0d40@199.117.52.25> I can't seem to figure out this one.... $day = "01"; $month = "10"; $year = "2001"; $hour = "2000"; $unix_timestamp = &mystery_function("$day","$month","$year","$hour"); is there some function out there to do this? it's easy to go the opposite direction, but I haven't been able to figure out how to go this way. TIA, Myke Michael Komarnitsky Komar Consulting Group 303.818.3718 http://consulting.komar.org http://climbingboulder.com - From porterje at us.ibm.com Fri Oct 26 14:03:27 2001 From: porterje at us.ibm.com (Jessee Porter) Date: Wed Aug 4 23:58:37 2004 Subject: [boulder.pm] date --> unix timestamp Message-ID: