APM: Location, location, location
jchristy1
jchristy1 at austin.rr.com
Thu Oct 5 14:17:17 PDT 2006
I like the ARL meeting place. It is quiet, centrally located, secure and
clean.
Maybe a simple justification to the state would work...?
It could be beneficial to the State to encourage sharing of technical
information among a pool of IT professionals that might someday be
called on to provide for IT staffing requirements.
Ian Remmler wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 02:08:08PM -0500, David Bluestein II wrote:
>> Downside to gNumber/Servergraph is locked front door, and needing
>> someone to monitor it.
>
> Well, I think ARL will also require me to escort people to the
> restroom now, so there will be annoyances either way. And
> someone will need to bring a projector, etc.
>
>> That's disappointing about ARL, weird too. Are you thinking we'll still
>> meet there next week though?
>
> It's because they are technically supposed to charge for
> external groups to use the facilities, unless it is for state
> business. They've really been a bit too lax about it until now.
> If we want to keep meeting there, I need to justify in writing
> how our meetings are benificial to the state. And since I'm the
> only person from ARL who goes to the meetings, it's a bit of a
> hard sell. :) That's why I'm hesitant to continue meeting
> there; I don't want to put ARL on a slippery slope.
>
> If we end up moving, it would be easier to go ahead and do it
> this month so I don't have to generate red tape for just one
> meeting. I do like hosting at ARL, but I'm just not sure if
> it's worth it with the new restrictions. It is a sucky
> situation.
>
> - Ian.
>
More information about the Austin
mailing list