[ABE.pm] [jand at activestate.com: RE: perl 5 and CLR (.NET)]

[Ricardo SIGNES]

* Tom Freedman <tfreedman at iqep.com> [2007-12-15T14:23:21]
> The COM+ 2.0 thing was amusing.  But I was more interested to hear that there
> was ever an attempt at implementing the Perl engine in a Microsoft tech.  I
> thought it hadn't even been tried.

I believe that a guy I know is attempting to do something related to
Parrot/Perl6 and CLR/.NET.  I don't know the details.

Perl 6 is designed to be less crazy about being portable, but more crazy in
other ways.

-- 
rjbs